insr floxed mice (Jackson Laboratory)
Structured Review

Insr Floxed Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/insr+floxed+mice/conditional+dicer+knockout+strain/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__04__722722-210-0-6
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Reprogramming insulin receptor activation with a de novo agonist to overcome severe insulin resistance"
Article Title: Reprogramming insulin receptor activation with a de novo agonist to overcome severe insulin resistance
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.05.04.722722
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Structural view of insulin binding at site-1 of the insulin receptor (IR). Asp707 (red) within the αCT motif (blue) of the IR is a key residue mediating site-1 insulin interaction. (B) Representative images of WT, D707A/+, and D707A/D707A littermates at embryonic day 18.5 and at birth. (C) Genotype distribution of WT, D707A/+, and D707A/D707A mice at different ages. (D) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining and periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) staining (magenta) of livers from WT and D707A/D707A newborn mice. (E) Breeding strategy used to generate conditional D707A/– mice. (F) Experimental scheme. Male and female mice (2–3 months old) were injected with tamoxifen for five consecutive days to delete the floxed WT IR allele and generate D707A/– mice. Data from male mice are shown in (G-L) and data from female mice are shown in . (G) Ad libitum blood glucose levels. D707A/F, n = 10; D707A/–, n = 12; –/–, n = 15. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; one-way ANOVA. (H) Fasting insulin levels. D707A/F, n = 9; D707A/–, n = 13; –/–, n = 7. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; one-way ANOVA. (I) Glucose tolerance test (GTT). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; two-way ANOVA; n = 8 mice per group; ****p < 0.0001. (J) Area under the curve (AUC) analysis of the GTT shown in (I). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; one-way ANOVA. (K) Percent change in body weight between pre-tamoxifen injection and the final day of the experiment. D707A/F, n = 8; D707A/–, n = 13; –/–, n =10. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; one-way ANOVA. (L) Representative H&E staining of pancreatic tissue.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Residue, Staining, Injection
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Experimental scheme. Female mice (2–3 months old) were injected with tamoxifen for five consecutive days to delete the floxed WT IR allele and generate D707A/– mice. Mice were fasted for 4 h and injected with PBS, 6 nmol/mouse Humulin or RF-409 via the inferior vena cava (IVC). Liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue were collected at 3, 5, and 7 min after injection, respectively. (B) Representative immunoblot of IR autophosphorylation, AKT phosphorylation (pAKT), and ERK phosphorylation (pERK) in skeletal muscle from IR D707A/– mice. (C) Quantification of immunoblot data shown in (B). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; PBS, n = 4; Humulin, n = 5; RF-409, n = 5; one-way ANOVA. (D) Representative immunoblot of IR autophosphorylation, pAKT, and pERK in adipose tissue from IR D707A/– mice. (E) Quantification of immunoblot data shown in (D). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; PBS, n = 4; Humulin, n = 5; RF-409, n = 5; one-way ANOVA.
Techniques Used: Injection, Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Representative immunoblot of IR protein levels in liver and skeletal muscle from IR D707A/– and IR –/– mice following a 4 h fast. (B) Quantification of immunoblot data shown in (A). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; IR D707A/-, n = 5; IR –/–, n = 7; one-way ANOVA. (C) Representative immunoblot of insulin receptor (IR) autophosphorylation, AKT phosphorylation (pAKT), and ERK phosphorylation (pERK) in liver from IR D707A/– mice. Mice were fasted for 4 h and injected with PBS, Humulin (6 nmol/mouse), or RF-409 via the inferior vena cava (IVC). Liver tissue was collected 3 min after injection. (D) Quantification of immunoblot data shown in (C). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; PBS, n = 4; Humulin, n = 5; RF-409, n = 5; one-way ANOVA. (E) Representative immunoblot of IR autophosphorylation in primary hepatocytes isolated from IR D707A/F;Cre-ERT mice. Cells were treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) to delete the floxed WT IR allele and generate IR D707A/– hepatocytes, followed by stimulation with insulin or RF-409 at the indicated concentrations for 10 min. (F) Quantification of immunoblot data shown in (E). Phosphorylation levels were normalized to total protein and expressed relative to the response to 100 nM insulin. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 3 independent experiments; ****p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Injection, Isolation
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Experimental scheme for chronic RF-409 treatment. Male mice (3 months old) were injected with tamoxifen for five consecutive days to delete the floxed WT IR allele and generate IR D707A/– mice. Following the final tamoxifen injection, osmotic pumps releasing PBS or RF-409 were implanted. Body composition was assessed by MRI prior to tamoxifen injection and 14 days after the final tamoxifen injection. (B) Ad libitum blood glucose levels during the treatment period. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 mice per treatment; two-way ANOVA; **p < 0.01. (C) Average ad libitum blood glucose levels calculated from (B). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 mice per treatment; Welch’s t test. (D) Fasting insulin levels at the end of the treatment period. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 mice per treatment; Welch’s t test. (E) Percent change in body weight over the treatment period. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 mice per treatment; Welch’s t test. (F) Percent change in fat mass. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 mice per treatment; Welch’s t test. (G) Percent change in lean mass. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 mice per treatment; Welch’s t test. (H) Epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) weight normalized to body weight. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 mice per treatment; Welch’s t test. (I) Representative H&E staining (top) and insulin immunostaining (bottom) of pancreatic tissue. (J) Pancreas weight normalized to body weight. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 mice per treatment; Welch’s t test. (K) Acinar area quantification. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5 mice per treatment; Welch’s t test. (L) Representative H&E staining of liver tissue.
Techniques Used: Injection, Staining, Immunostaining
Related Articles
Mouse Assay:Article Title: Reprogramming insulin receptor activation with a de novo agonist to overcome severe insulin resistance Article Snippet: IR D707A/+ mice were backcrossed to a C57BL/6J background (The Jackson Laboratory, #000664) for at least three generations. .. other:Article Title: Insulin signaling in LepR cells modulates fat and glucose homeostasis independent of leptin Article Snippet: The LepR-Cre [B6.129(Cg) – Lepr tme(cre)rck /J, Article Title: Insulin signaling in LepR cells modulates fat and glucose homeostasis independent of leptin. Article Snippet: The LepR-Cre [B6.129(Cg) – Leprtme(cre)rck/J, |


